Date: 2007-01-15 05:17 pm (UTC)
I know it's wrong to even consider the characters in the movie as actual entities with personalities, but why did Consuela's attitude toward Sean Connery just flip like a switch? You're a horrible beast, oh, no, whoops, I mean let's get married. I imagine the RAW AWESOMENESS of Sean Connery and his little loincloth was just too much to ignore or something, but who really knows.

That's a very typical sixties/seventies kind of idea, though, particularly where Sean Connery is involved. Think of Pussy Galore in Goldfinger: she flips to the side of good (and, I think it's implied, heterosexuality) because James Bond essentially rapes her, or tries to until she starts to like it, I forget which. Also, in that era there was this whole mostly-well-intentioned idea of raw sexuality overcoming crushing conventionality by BLOWING CONVENTIONALITY'S MIND, which got mixed up with a bunch of wholly unsavory ideas about deflowering the stuck-up ice queen.

I'm ashamed to say that the first time I saw Zardoz, when I was a graduate student and easily impressed by pretentious stuff, I was kind of favorably impressed by how it actually attempted to pull together a lot of basic science-fiction ideas in an ambitious way, and I didn't hate it overall. The second time I saw it, the "oh, come on" reflex kicked in. I mean, it's just a completely ridiculous movie, and the good ideas that are in it were done way better by Arthur C. Clarke in The City and the Stars.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

zustifer: (Default)
Karla Z

February 2012

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 272829   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 19th, 2025 01:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios