Today is a good day to overthink things.
Oct. 8th, 2007 08:21 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
We've been watching ST:TNG episodes lately, and, since we broke through the first season and it started getting good, we've been inhaling a lot of them (it's been a while since I've seen some of these, especially in order). We just finished with the two first Locutus episodes, and they made me wonder a bit about a couple of things.
First, the creation of a 'speaker' by the Borg, as an intermediary between them and a soon-to-be-Borged race, makes vague sense on the surface. This wiki says that the role was (at least) retconned in an in-universe Shatner novel (shudder) to be for the purpose of 'less waste' in the assimilation. This is cute, but I don't really think we see any evidence of this from Locutus. He doesn't exactly appeal to the Enterprise on any particularly human basis; he pretty much just hits the 'resistance is futile' button. The most personal he gets is to name people, and to speak directly to Riker. So I'm not really seeing the benefit for the Borg here. Maybe they just have a really bad sense of what people need in order to feel convinced. Maybe Shatner is just not a very good writer.
Second, he has a name. Supposedly this is normal for a speaker (and there is a Romulan in Shatner's book who has the same role, but that means exactly nothing). The funny thing is, 'Locutus' is clearly Latin-derived. Did Picard name himself? He'd know enough Latin to do this, probably, whereas the Borg sure shouldn't. This is a cute idea, that he was their first speaker and therefore they took ideas about how this should be done from his brain. However, the Shatner-book ruins it again by mentioning that the Borg had made a speaker for the Romulan worlds, named 'Vox.' This is just annoying, because what do Romulans care for Latin? Unless the stupid progenitor-race that made all the Star Trek sentient species humanoid also seeded a latinate root-language, but, honestly, that's even too stupid for me to consider. So, again, I must conclude that Shatner ruins everything. But in a hilarious way.
First, the creation of a 'speaker' by the Borg, as an intermediary between them and a soon-to-be-Borged race, makes vague sense on the surface. This wiki says that the role was (at least) retconned in an in-universe Shatner novel (shudder) to be for the purpose of 'less waste' in the assimilation. This is cute, but I don't really think we see any evidence of this from Locutus. He doesn't exactly appeal to the Enterprise on any particularly human basis; he pretty much just hits the 'resistance is futile' button. The most personal he gets is to name people, and to speak directly to Riker. So I'm not really seeing the benefit for the Borg here. Maybe they just have a really bad sense of what people need in order to feel convinced. Maybe Shatner is just not a very good writer.
Second, he has a name. Supposedly this is normal for a speaker (and there is a Romulan in Shatner's book who has the same role, but that means exactly nothing). The funny thing is, 'Locutus' is clearly Latin-derived. Did Picard name himself? He'd know enough Latin to do this, probably, whereas the Borg sure shouldn't. This is a cute idea, that he was their first speaker and therefore they took ideas about how this should be done from his brain. However, the Shatner-book ruins it again by mentioning that the Borg had made a speaker for the Romulan worlds, named 'Vox.' This is just annoying, because what do Romulans care for Latin? Unless the stupid progenitor-race that made all the Star Trek sentient species humanoid also seeded a latinate root-language, but, honestly, that's even too stupid for me to consider. So, again, I must conclude that Shatner ruins everything. But in a hilarious way.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 01:58 am (UTC)It's still my strongest referent for dermally-applied future-drugs.
I need a better term than 'irony' for stuff like this. I love it, but I love it in a way that means it can also be really bad.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 07:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 03:14 am (UTC)Unfortunately, Ferengi are all liars who smell bad.
(NO! Says the man in engineering.
NO! Says the head of security.)
^^ This is a Bioshock joke. Please ignore.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 03:19 pm (UTC)Freaking humans as Best Race Ever! How lame. It was worse in Original Trek though, what with the 'emotions are what make us special' every third episode.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 03:47 am (UTC)Don't mind me, says Mr. Spock, just pretend I'm not standing right here on the bridge...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 03:43 am (UTC)The Borg as introduced in their very first appearance were pretty scary, though they would also have been hard to write for long--they were basically an unbeatable menace.
As for the Romulans, I always got a weird sense from the original series that they were vaguely imagined as having parallel-Earth-Roman-Empire aspects. In Old Star Trek's galaxy, there were parallel Earths and funhouse-distorted parallel Earths lying around all over the place, so that scenes there could be filmed easily with existing sets and costumes. For these Vulcan-related aliens to have inexplicable cultural and linguistic similarities to Earth's Roman Empire would not have been too far out of line. TNG and later series mostly retconned that stuff away without comment.